
Killer of Lottery Winner Convicted of Manslaughter

The defendant in the case of stabbed Redmond woman Chloe Whittle has been convicted of manslaughter, avoiding a murder charge.
Ms Whittle won £13 million playing the lottery in March 2019. Jade Hartman, a friend of the victim, had attempted to steal Ms Whittle’s belongings, as she walked home through a Redmond park.
Police arrested the 23-year-old woman after a Redmond police detective discovered evidence connecting her with the death. During the trial, Ms Hartman admitted to killing Ms Whittle, but claimed it was accidental and denied the charge of murder.
In court, she said “I only intended to steal her watch. It was worth a lot of money, more than enough to clear my debts. I never meant to kill her.”
According to Ms Hartman, her mugging attempt went awry and in an unfortnuate turn of events, Ms Hartman fell on Ms Whittle, forcing a knife in Ms Whittle’s pocket into her chest.
Barbara Funnell, counsel for the defence, said after court that “my client had taken out some unwise loans that she had no means of paying back, and took to thievery to secure the money. She admits to this, and regrets that her actions led to her friend’s death, so we are thankful she was able to avoid a murder conviction.”
Ms Hartman also pleaded guilty to a charge of conspiracy to commit theft. Her co-conspirator, Jack Piper – who was stuck on a train at the time of the incident -was also found guilty of the same charge.
It emerged that the knife had been stolen by Ms Whittle from the restaurant she had eaten at that night, and, after being wiped clean, was returned by Ms Hartman in an attempt to hide the evidence. The knife was then cleaned by unassuming dishwashing staff and put back into service. The owner of the restaurant, who asked for anonymity, said “we have no way of knowing which knife was the knife, so we’re replacing all our knives so our diners can be 100% certain that the knife they use hasn’t been used as a murder weapon.”
Ms Hartman is due in court next week for sentencing.
‘One of a Kind’
Many of the people close to Chloe were in court today to hear the verdict. Chloe’s father Jeremy Whittle said “I’m glad to see justice prevail, but it won’t ease the fact that she was robbed from us far too soon. I was awful to her the night she died, getting angry with her for not sharing her lottery winnings. I’m devastated that I never got the chance to apologise, and I’ll never forgive myself for the way I spent my last moments with her.”
Chloe’s boyfriend Nathaniel Bettsley, who was in Cheltenham to watch the Gold Cup race when Chloe died, said “she was one of a kind. I can’t help but feel a bit responsible – I persuaded her to buy that lotto ticket, she hadn’t played before she met me. If she hadn’t bought that ticket, maybe none of this would’ve happened. I definitely think I should’ve been more caring when she won – I let my greed get the better of me.”
Chloe’s former employer, Amanda Huxley, who was located in a different Redmond park on the night of Chloe’s death, said “hopefully the verdict will help to bring the community some closure. I speak for everyone at the salon when I say we’ll miss her forever. She helped turn the business around, and I was upset when she chose to leave us. Looking back now, I wish I had been more supportive. I’m certainly glad Chloe never saw that sinister letter that was shown as evidence in the court proceedings.”
The letter in question had been sent by Nicole Dupp, a former friend of Chloe’s. When approached for comment, she said “I never meant to send that letter. I regret ever writing it. I wrote it and sealed it in an envelope just to vent my fury, it was never my intention to actually post it to Chloe and have her read it. It was my mum who found the envelope and, not knowing what it was, put it in the post. It was all a mistake.”
Case Summary
A detailed summary of the clues for each suspect…Did you find all of them?:
Case Summary
Accessing Jess’s Mailbox
The lead investigator on this case, J Hamblen, handed the case over to you so that she could go on her honeymoon (See: Internal memo).
You were left trying to gain access to her mailbox at www.redmondpd.co.uk. She gave you her username and you needed to find the password. Jess left a sticky note on the internal memo telling you that the password is “MY HUSBANDS FIRST NAME” (note the capitalisation as this is a clue to the capitalisation used in the password) followed by their wedding date (DDMMYY).
We know that Jess is married to a man named Tim (See: The “correction” segment of the newspaper article). From the same article, we can work out what the date of Jess’s wedding was. The paper is a Sunday newspaper issued on the 17th March, meaning the previous issue was Sunday 10th March. Since they got married the day before that paper was issued, the date you were looking for was the 9th March 2019 or “090319” when written in the format Jess gave you.
But you aren’t done there…
When you got the password wrong the first time, that triggered an error on the website, telling you that passwords were case sensitive and must contain more than 10 characters. Since the given date format is set at 6 characters long, the only way to make the password longer than 10 characters is by lengthening Tim’s name, hence the password was “TIMOTHY090319”.
Amanda Huxley
According to the record of communications from device number +44 7555 92541, Amanda was worried that Chloe was going to steal all of her clients. We also know that Amanda was desperate for cash – the balance sheet of her business showed that she was in debt. Unfortunately for her, that debt happened to amount to a figure that was very similar to the amount mentioned in the deleted text messages (£20,000 in the messages and -£19,082 on her balance sheet). This may have led you to believe that Amanda was one of the people in the Record of Communications for Device number+44 755584257. However, hacking into Jess’s online mailbox allowed you to access an email showing the RAOS membership list (an attachment to one of the emails). Amanda’s name was on that list, and that’s relevant because the Sunday Bugle & Post mentioned that all 22 members of the RAOS were in Wright Park at the time of Chloe’s murder, giving Amanda a strong alibi.
Nicole Dupp
The psychiatrist report mentions that Nicole enjoys “tapping away at typewriter”, so you were correct to assume that the typewritten letter found in the envelope was written by Nicole.
Nicole wrote the letter in anger shortly after being fobbed off by Chloe (references to this “fobbing off” were made in the record of communications from device number +44 7555 92541, and in the second psychiatrist report).
That aside, Nicole had a very strong alibi – her psychiatrist made it clear that she has a severe case of agoraphobia – a fear of wide-open spaces. The second psychiatrist report was written a day before Chloe died, and Nicole ‘s condition hadn’t improved at all since the previous psychiatrist’s report that was written a week earlier.
Since the murder happened in a park, and Nicole wasn’t even able to approach an open playing field in her exposure treatment, it couldn’t possibly have been Nicole that killed Chloe.
Her red hair may have caused some confusion, but it’s safe to say it wasn’t her in the restaurant CCTV image – she wasn’t even able to attend the hairdressers without her mother being with her.
Nathaniel
By reading the record of communications from device number +44 7555 92541, we found out that it was Nathaniels birthday on 15th March, and that he was going out with friends for a traditional “annual trip” on that day…the day that Chloe died.
In the record of communications (device number +44 755539103), Someone is talking to their friends, and it’s apparent that they’ve all gone to the horse racing at Cheltenham.
We can safely assume that the Betshed betting slip belongs to Nathaniel for a couple of reasons:
In the record of communications (device number +44 755539103), he texts his friends at 16:08 telling his them that’s he’s “got [his] ticket”, just after the BetShed ticket was issued (at 16:07).
Furthermore, in the same record of communications, Nathaniel sent a text saying “Yeah, I thought screw it, I’ll just play my birthday” referring to which horses he intends to bet on. When you examine the horse numbers on the betshed ticket, you see that they are numbers 15 and 03 (i.e. 15th March…Nathaniel’s birthday!). Since you know the ticket belongs to Nathaniel, you know the phone belongs to him too.
After the horse racing, it’s clear that Nathaniel was set on having a big night out on the town, with his friends. The text messages went a little awry after all of the drinks that he’d had, but they managed to get back to where they were staying that night.
The Betshed ticket had the address of the race course written at the bottom of it: Gloucestershire. There was also a Gloucestershire cabs receipt showing that a short journey was taken at 21:52 on the 15th March.
The final drunken text on the record of communications (device number +44 755539103), came in at 22:05, drunkenly slurring the sentence “we both got back OK Simon, we’re going to sleep now”. Since they only took a short cab journey which ended at 22:01, you can safely assume that they were still in Gloucestershire and staying there for the night.
If there was any doubt of how far Gloucestershire was from Redmond, it’s shown on the front of the Train Times leaflet. It’s a much further journey than that of London Victoria to Horsham, which takes just over an hour by train (and is indicated by the red line).
So, despite his recent arguments with Chloe, Nathaniel is innocent and has a strong alibi.
Jeremy
In the CCTV image at the restaurant, the logo on the doors and wall is the same as the logo on the knife found in the possession of Jeremy Whittle. The logo reads “AB” for “Andy’s Bistro” which is the restaurant that Jeremy ate at with Chloe shortly before she died. Chloe had said she was going there on Friday with her dad in the record of communications from device number +44 7555 92541. The waiter confirms that they ate there too.
Jeremy is a known criminal. He got out of prison just 6 months before the night that Chloe died. The newspaper article would have you think that Jeremy was the killer because he had a knife in his possession, but it turns out that Chloe and Jeremy both took a knife from the restaurant that night. The email from the restaurant waiter (in J Hamblens inbox) explains that it’s not unsual for their cutlery to go missing.
In the “forensic results” email (found in the online webmail), Al Lydecker explained that the forensic evidence found on the knife that Jeremy had, was just from the steak that he’d eaten earlier that evening.
Jeremy no longer has any incriminating evidence against him and his probation report paints him in good light too, so we can eliminate him as a suspect.
Jack
You’d be forgiven for initially thinking that the incoming messages on the Record of communications for Device number+44 755584257, were from Jeremy. It was clearly from someone that Chloe had fallen out with at some stage since she’d “probably blocked [their] number”.
However, a number of other clues lead us to the fact that the incoming messages were indeed from ‘Jack….
Initially, all we know about Jack is that Chloe has fallen out with him – the new year’s eve photo shows that Jack’s face had been scribbled out in anger, as if to erase him from the picture.
To get the full picture of Jack, you’d first have to gain access to the online webmail, where an email from Zoe Whitlock (in the Cyber Department) managed to recover the deleted messages seen in the Record of communications from Device number+44 755584257.
Deciphering the cryptic deleted messsages wasn’t easy, but those with a keen eye will have noticed a time was written in the cypher, along with certain one-letter words and odd abbreviations. Using that information, it was possible to decipher the code: Every letter was replaced with its alphabetic opposite. A=Z, B=Y, C=X etc. Using this code, we could work out that someone was stuck on the train at the time of the murder.
We then head over to the trainline CCTV, where Jack (the guy from the new year’s eve photo in the red and white stripey scarf), is seen boarding the train at a station. The station name in glowing letters (on the train CCTV images) appears to end with the letters “tham”, and the only train station on the same line as Redmond ending in those letters is “Streatham”. The problem is, the train leaving Streatham at the time Jack boarded the train had gotten held up when it approached Redmond (according to the newspaper report), so Jack has a very strong alibi, leaving everyone thinking that the killer must have been the person that Jack was talking to in the Record of communications (Device number+44 755584257)…but who was that!?…
Jade
The owner of device number +44 755584257 was clearly someone that was friends with both Chloe and Jack because that number had messaged both people. This person also knew that Chloe had fallen out with Jack (see Record of communications – Device number+44 755584257). The New years eve photo of Jade, Jack and Chloe ties-in with these concepts, but there’s also a couple of other little clues in that photo. 1. The device description in the record of communications is of a pale pink phone case, much like the one Jade has in her hand and, 2. Jade’s hair is coloured red.
In his witness statement, Tom Ratcliff – the waiter at Andy’s Bistro, said that Chloe left the restaurant at around 9:30pm. He also said that he’d found a steak knife on the booking stand at the end of the night.
The CCTV image shows a girl with red hair at the booking stand at 21:50 (we already know this can’t have been Nicole). The woman at the booking stand appears to be interacting with the knife there. Given the timings of when Chloe left the restaurant, and when the dog walker (Susana Yardley’s witness statement) saw the two people scuffling in the park, you can safely assume that Chloe’s death had taken place before the CCTV captured this image. Furthermore, the waiter found the knife on the booking stand towards the end of the night, so it is likely that the person with red hair was placing the knife there at that time, rather than taking it. We now have incriminating evidence against Jade, with no alibi!
After Chloe had fallen on the knife that she put into her jacket pocket, Jade in a panicked state returned the knife to the restaurant in order to put it back into circulation so that it would never be found…not realising that she’d be unable to fully cover her tracks!!!

Hi, I’m Luke – Congratulations on finding the killer!!! We hope you had a great time playing our game—we had an absolute blast creating it! I have a polite request…Right now, fewer than 1% of players leave a review – a small group who make a big impact! Please will you be part of that 1% by leaving a quick review? Thank you so much for your support.
Please click on your flag to be taken to the relevant review page:

Get 10% off Today!
As a token of appreciation, I'd like to send you an exclusive discount for your next case file. Simply complete the form below, and I'll send you the discount code via email. I'd also like to send you other related discounts, offers and communications that I think you'd enjoy. Thanks, Luke.